rmwf Misinterpretation and free movements of products
Gönderilme zamanı: Cmt Ağu 08, 2026 12:24 pm
Dffx Trouble afoot at railway station
EU nature law fight ends in pyrrhic victory for Green Deal defendersThe final text includes major concessions to conservative lawmakers, weakening key parts of the legislation.Copy LinkCopiedShare via emailShare on XShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedInFree article usually reserved for subscribersSean Gallup/Getty ImagesNovember 10, 20232:27 pm CETBy Louise GuillotEU negotiators have finally clinched a political deal on new rules aimed at boosting nature restoration across the bloc, saving the legislation from a conservative-led campaign to kill it. But if green-minded politicians let out a sigh of relief after months of campaigning and hours of negotiations on Thursday, the final deal is bit tappo stanley tersweet as it came at a high price: major concessions to the center-right European Peoples Party. The largest group in the European Parliament and the most vocal critic of the bill aimed at restoring the EU s damaged ecosystems, the EPP, over the past year led a tough campaign against the legislation, claiming it would hurt Europe s farmers and put the bloc s food security at risk. It successfully weakened the Parliament s position going into the talks, where it pushed to water down key aspects even further.AdvertisementAdvertiseme stanley cup ntWriting on X after the deal was reached, German MEP Peter Liese celebrated that what had been a pira stanley cup nha is now a goldfish without teeth. I wanted more, of course, but this is a deal, the Parliaments lead negotiator C茅sar Luena, a member of the center-left Xmdr Calais: How many people will we let die in the English Channel
Hidden dangers in EU riversToxic chemical found in EU rivers.Copy LinkCopiedS stanley canada hare via emailShare on XShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedInMay 11, 20109:23 pm CETBy Jennifer RankinA toxic chemical that feminises fish and other marine life has been found above legal minimum levels in rivers in at least four EU member states. A study by Greenpeace published today 12 May of six member states found excessive levels of nonlyphe stanley canada nol in rivers in the Czech Republic, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Nonlyphenol is a man-made c stanley cup hemical used in detergents and pesticides, and is one of 11 priority hazardous substances that should be eliminated from European waters under the EUs water framework directive see above . The substance is already banned from most uses under a 2003 directive on the marketing and use of dangerous substances, but the chemical gets into water systems through the washing of clothes bearing traces of it in dyes and textiles. It remains in sewage sludge even after treatment, and is almost impossible to break down. AdvertisementAdvertisementLack of information Greenpeace studied the river basin management plans that countries are required to draw up under the water framework directive, but found that none of these plans had any information about monitoring nonlyphenol or how to reduce excessive concentrations. An examination of alternative official data revealed that nonlyphenol exceeded legal minimums of 0.3 milligrams per litre annual average in the Lower Elbe in the Czec
EU nature law fight ends in pyrrhic victory for Green Deal defendersThe final text includes major concessions to conservative lawmakers, weakening key parts of the legislation.Copy LinkCopiedShare via emailShare on XShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedInFree article usually reserved for subscribersSean Gallup/Getty ImagesNovember 10, 20232:27 pm CETBy Louise GuillotEU negotiators have finally clinched a political deal on new rules aimed at boosting nature restoration across the bloc, saving the legislation from a conservative-led campaign to kill it. But if green-minded politicians let out a sigh of relief after months of campaigning and hours of negotiations on Thursday, the final deal is bit tappo stanley tersweet as it came at a high price: major concessions to the center-right European Peoples Party. The largest group in the European Parliament and the most vocal critic of the bill aimed at restoring the EU s damaged ecosystems, the EPP, over the past year led a tough campaign against the legislation, claiming it would hurt Europe s farmers and put the bloc s food security at risk. It successfully weakened the Parliament s position going into the talks, where it pushed to water down key aspects even further.AdvertisementAdvertiseme stanley cup ntWriting on X after the deal was reached, German MEP Peter Liese celebrated that what had been a pira stanley cup nha is now a goldfish without teeth. I wanted more, of course, but this is a deal, the Parliaments lead negotiator C茅sar Luena, a member of the center-left Xmdr Calais: How many people will we let die in the English Channel
Hidden dangers in EU riversToxic chemical found in EU rivers.Copy LinkCopiedS stanley canada hare via emailShare on XShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedInMay 11, 20109:23 pm CETBy Jennifer RankinA toxic chemical that feminises fish and other marine life has been found above legal minimum levels in rivers in at least four EU member states. A study by Greenpeace published today 12 May of six member states found excessive levels of nonlyphe stanley canada nol in rivers in the Czech Republic, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Nonlyphenol is a man-made c stanley cup hemical used in detergents and pesticides, and is one of 11 priority hazardous substances that should be eliminated from European waters under the EUs water framework directive see above . The substance is already banned from most uses under a 2003 directive on the marketing and use of dangerous substances, but the chemical gets into water systems through the washing of clothes bearing traces of it in dyes and textiles. It remains in sewage sludge even after treatment, and is almost impossible to break down. AdvertisementAdvertisementLack of information Greenpeace studied the river basin management plans that countries are required to draw up under the water framework directive, but found that none of these plans had any information about monitoring nonlyphenol or how to reduce excessive concentrations. An examination of alternative official data revealed that nonlyphenol exceeded legal minimums of 0.3 milligrams per litre annual average in the Lower Elbe in the Czec